|
The one-half of 1 percent sales tax
increase that voters turned down in November will be back on the
ballot April 1, and aldermen discussed ways to sell the idea to
voters the second time around.
Alderman Michael Montcalm opened the
discussion by offering to contribute $100 of his own money to print
fliers and otherwise publicize the upcoming referendum and by asking
other city officials to do the same.
"Are we going to try to do it, or are
we going to go on spinning our wheels?" he asked.
Because it is against the law to spend
city funds to promote the referendum, aldermen have previously
discussed raising money on their own. Most also believe the public
is not well enough informed about the tax increase, which is
estimated to add about $550,000 per year to the city's revenue.
"People's biggest concern is what is
the money to be spent for," Montcalm said.
By Illinois law the money must be spent
for infrastructure, such as road and bridge work. The city has no
money in the budget right now for road repairs.
Several other aldermen and Mayor Beth
Davis agreed to contribute to a publicity fund.
"If we as the city are asking the
public to give, we have to give too," Bill Melton said. "We also
have to show the public we're going to cut as much as we can
possibly cut," he added.
City Attorney Bill Bates told the
council that making personal contributions isn't as simple as it
sounds. If contributions reach a certain level, such as $500 or
$1,000, forms must be filed with the state of Illinois.
Alderman Steve Fuhrer, head of a newly
appointed committee to educate the public about the 0.5 percent
increase, asked Bates to check on the legalities of using personal
funds and said he would be calling for a meeting of the committee
soon.
Alderman George Mitchell asked how soon
the city would see the new tax money if the referendum is passed.
Les Plotner, city treasurer, said even
if the referendum passes on April 1 of 2003, the tax won't go into
effect until January of 2004, and the city will not see any money
until April of 2004.
Plotner had little good news for the
city when he gave his financial report for the first six months of
the current fiscal year, May 1, 2002, to April 30, 2003. The report
showed how the city's income from various sources has dropped this
year compared with previous years.
Income from shared revenue sources --
income tax, motor fuel tax, state use tax and photo processing tax
-- dropped in fiscal year 2001-2002 and is projected to drop further
in the next two years. The photo processing tax is no longer being
received by cities and now goes into state coffers instead, Plotner
said.
In 2000-2001, the city received
$1,856,818 from these four sources. In 2001-2002, receipts dropped
to $1,714,535. Projections show 2002-2003 revenue dropping again, to
$1,616,511, possibly rising slightly to $1,639,103 in 2003-2004.
Income from the corporate personal
property replacement tax also dropped in the first six months of the
current fiscal year. Through October of 2001, the city had received
$122,630.75, but this year it has received only $87,270, almost 30
percent less.
Income tax revenues have also dropped
in the current fiscal year by 2.45 percent, from $1,098,282 for
2000-2001 to $1,009,892 for 2001-2002. Plotner estimates a greater
drop for the next fiscal year, almost 15 percent.
[to top of second column
in this article]
|
Perhaps the most startling news in
Plotner's report was the difference between the funds the city
expected to earn from its investments and the amount it is actually
receiving. Historically low interest rates have cut the amount
earned in the first six months of the fiscal year to $18,203, only
21.4 percent of the estimated $84,950 that was projected.
The treasurer's report held one bit of
good news.
"If there is one bright star in the
revenue picture, it's our sales tax receipts," he told the council.
"They are actually up about $13,000, or 1.49 percent, for the first
seven months of this year."
Last fiscal year, May through November
sales taxes received were $1,100,839, while this year they were
$1,113,496, he said.
Plotner also said that because interest
rates are so low, the city might have to dip into the fire and
police pension fund principal to pay current pensions before the
year is out. "This is not a pretty picture, and it is not going to
go away," he said.
"The finance committee is going to have
a difficult time dealing with the budget next year. They may have to
think about some service cuts," he said.
The finance and ordinance and zoning
committees approved next year's combined tax levy of $1,414,642.90,
which includes $1,241,872.90 for the corporate and special purpose
tax levy and $172,770 for the proposed debt service levy for the
general obligation bond. A public hearing on the tax levy was set
for Tuesday, Dec. 10, at 7 p.m., and the levy will be on the agenda
at the next regular meeting Dec. 16.
In other business, the council approved
several ordinances and resolutions. The property at 416-422 Woodlawn
Road, belonging to the Glenn Buelter estate, was rezoned from R-2
(residential) to C-2 (commercial). Jim and Shelley Horn of J & S
Auto Centre plan to construct a new building on the site.
The council also approved the second
phase of the sewer rate increase, raising residential rates from the
current $14 per month to $16.43 and raising rates for commercial,
industrial and institutional users based on their use. The increase
was necessary to secure the $9.8 million loan from the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency for the sewer plant upgrade. New
rates will go into effect July 1, 2003.
The council voted to make Ottawa Street
between Union and Broadway one way going north, to help make the
area safer for school children when the new Central School is
completed. They also approved increasing the number of members on
the Lincoln Planning Commission from 10 to 11. Mayor Davis said she
would present a name for appointment to the 11th spot soon.
Police Chief Rich Montcalm told the
council the Lincoln Police Department has received a $10,000 grant
from Monsanto Seed Company of Mason City to continue its Youth
Violence Prevention program. The Lincoln department was one of
several that applied for the grant, and its program merited
receiving the entire amount available, Montcalm said.
Fire Chief
Bucky Washam reported that the fire and police departments have been
conducting interagency training for dealing with major disasters. He
said it is the first time the two departments have worked together
on such a project.
[Joan Crabb]
|
