Tuesday, April 22

Council votes yes on EDC park plan

[APRIL 22, 2003]  The Lincoln City Council moved the dream of a north-side industrial park a giant step closer to reality Monday night when aldermen voted unanimously to commit $1.1 million toward a sewer line to the proposed development.

At the end of a long meeting during which they heard complaints from developers and a warning from the city treasurer, and although it is almost certain the city will have a deficit budget for 2003-04, all nine aldermen voted to support borrowing money for infrastructure for the proposed 63.25-acre industrial park northeast of the city.

"Somebody has to say yes, let's do something to make Lincoln grow," Alderman Steve Fuhrer said before the vote.

"The economy is bound to turn around sometime, and I'd like to see Lincoln be ready," added Alderman Verl Prather.

In spite of this positive step, many questions about the proposed park are still unanswered, as city attorney Bill Bates pointed out. The final motion to provide the $1.1 million was contingent upon several conditions suggested by Bates: on the acquisition of the land by Logan County or some other body, its annexation to the city and also by the city's ability to get a loan for the project.

The Logan County Board has not yet agreed to buy the land and is currently involved in a dispute with the Economic Development Council, the group that put the industrial park proposal together. The board is presently withholding its annual funding of $25,000 for the EDC because it contends EDC meetings should be open to the public.

 

City Treasurer Les Plotner also posed some questions to the council, advising them to get more information before making a commitment.

"I think you need to explore this before you jump. Is there a sound estimate on what it will really cost to go out there?" he asked, referring to the sewer extension to the proposed site at Kruger Road and Business 55. He also wanted to know who would own the land if it is purchased by the county, whether the city would get the revenue from any development and what contribution the present landowners will make to the industrial park.

"If all this information is available, why don't people know about it?" he asked.

Plotner also warned against using revenue from the 0.5 percent sales tax increase that voters approved April 1, pointing out that money was to be used to improve existing infrastructure.

Attorney Doug Muck questioned whether the city would really get the favorable loan rates EDC director Jeff Mayfield gave the council at its work session last week. Mayfield said he and Mayor Beth Davis had met with representatives of seven lending institutions in the county and presented figures for a 20-year loan at 3 percent, with initial payments of only about $30,000.

Muck said he has talked to several bank presidents and believed the proposal had been discussed only in "vague terms."

"Be sure you have a loan commitment in place before you spend city money," he advised.

Muck said he and fellow developer Henry Spellman had "a little bit of a bad taste in our mouths" about the present project because the city had failed to help them with proposed developments in the past.

"We would have brought in projects that would have promoted economic development," he said. "We've had prospects ready to start a business and been turned away."

In the 1980s, he said, the city refused to fund a $30,000 sewer extension to a property on the west side which would have brought in a laboratory making spackling compound. Later, about 1990, the city refused to allow the developers to build a road to another industrial site. He said they needed to build only 200 feet of road but the city insisted they build 1,000 feet. He also said they have never been able to convince the city to build a road connecting Fifth Street and Woodlawn Road, which would open up 600 or 700 acres for development.

 

 

[to top of second column in this article]

"Muck made a good presentation," Alderman Benny Huskins said. "I'm sure the council is willing to work with you in any way," he told Muck.

Mayfield and several other aldermen also pledged to help Muck and Spellman. Mayfield has emphasized that the EDC is supporting development city- and countywide, not just at the north-side site.

Mayor Beth Davis pointed out that it is the north-side site that prospective developers are currently interested in. Both Mayfield and former EDC director Mark Smith have emphasized that right now developers are looking at the north side because they need a site not close to residential or retail development. Clients also want a site that is already developed so they don't have to wait for infrastructure, and if such a site is not available, they will move on to other communities, Mayfield said

Jerry Johnson of Atlanta, a member of EDC for about 20 years, said Atlanta bought seven acres of land for an industrial site and now has a trucking company, a motel and other revenue-producing businesses.

"What Mr. Muck is talking about is in the past. If we don't take positive steps now, we are going back into the past."

Johnson said the EDC is also willing to help Muck and others develop the west side.

Responding to questions about the actual cost of the sewer extension, Grant Eaton, sewer plant manager, said that to get firm figures he would have to know the amount of flow the system needed to handle, how many businesses would be involved and the exact route the extension would take.

He said a lift station, which will be needed, will cost about $150,000, and each linear foot of sewer line will also cost about $150,000.

He also said sewer lines will have to be upgraded if more development takes place on the west side but conceded that a west-side upgrade would be less expensive than the north-side site.

Mayor Beth Davis, a supporter of the EDC plan, said both the water company and AmerenCILCO are interested in participating in the proposed development.

Several aldermen praised Mayfield, who has served as EDC director for only about three months, for his work and his enthusiasm.

"I was excited when Mr. Mayfield came on board. We need somebody to bring people together. Everybody is working against everybody else, and somebody needs to take this first step," Alderman Bill Melton said.

Mayfield said last week that he is hopeful development will come quickly and pay or at least help pay off the $1.1 million loan without dipping into city coffers.

 

Even though it recently cut six employees, the city is facing a deficit for the coming fiscal year. Revenues are expected to be $3,902,068, with expenditure requests coming to $4,086,245. The $184,177 deficit may be reduced if all four unions representing city workers agree to a new health insurance plan that can save the city another $100,000.

"You might think this is the worst time to do something," Prather said. "Probably it's the best time because we've got to do something to get more revenue." He noted that the city will be able to take advantage of the historically low interest rates right now.

"I don't know how many times I've heard people here say, ‘Why doesn't the city do something?'" council member Marty Neitzel said.

"As the youngest council member, with a new family, I support this," said Alderman Pat Madigan. He said he had lived away from Lincoln for a time but had always wanted to come back and keep his family here.

[Joan Crabb]


Articles from the past week

Monday:

Saturday:

Friday:

Thursday:

Wednesday:

Tuesday:

Back to top


 

News | Sports | Business | Rural Review | Teaching & Learning | Home and Family | Tourism | Obituaries

Community | Perspectives | Law & Courts | Leisure Time | Spiritual Life | Health & Fitness | Teen Scene
Calendar | Letters to the Editor