City briefs
City
preparing to re-sign county agreements
Send a link to a friend
Several have come due
[DEC. 1, 2003]
At last week's council work
session, Bill Bates, the city's attorney, raised several questions
in regard to annual agreements with the county. The city has several
agreements that have come due on sharing expenses at the Logan
County Safety Complex.
|
The standard agreement with the 911
board needs to have some clauses added to cover changes that will
take place if the new 911 proposal should be accepted by voters.
At present the city owns and is
responsible for specific equipment. It became apparent that the
maintenance and repair costs of the equipment would no longer be
under the control of the city. "We're not going to have some third
party decide when we're going to spend money and when we're not,"
Bates said.
The attorney for the 911 board, Chris
Walters from Canton,
responded that he could get it worked out so expenditures are
relayed by someone like the police chief and then are approved
through the council first. "I just want you to know, though, until
those items are repaired you might not be receiving all your
services," he said.
Another option is to have a contact
person (liaison) who would have the right to approve expenditures.
[to top of second column in this
article] |
Another consideration that needs
addressed due to the new 911 proposal is the standard agreement to
share in the cost of operating the 911 center. The city originally
agreed to pay $42,000 spread out over seven years in annual $6,000
payments. There are still two years left on this. Does the city
still have to pay this? Bates wanted to know.
Bates is waiting to hear from Logan
County State's Attorney Tim Huyett, who is handling the county's
side of the new 911 agreement.
In addition, the police department
lease agreement is due. That lease has gone up 13.3 percent. The
increase was explained as an oversight that was noted by former
county board member Doug Dutz.
The base
rate was $24,918 per year. It was supposed to be raised a bit each
year but has not been since 1997. The increase constitutes less than
2 percent per year, and the city is not being asked to make up the
differences for the years there were no increases. So, the city is
actually getting a deal.
[Jan
Youngquist] |