| 
    Managing conflict can be a key part of 
    retirement planning       
 Send a link to a friend 
            [MARCH 
            5, 2005]  
            Disagreements and conflicts 
            are normal when people spend as much time together as they do in 
            retirement. But you can work on a process to manage the conflict, 
            says Sharon Danes, family economist with the University of Minnesota 
            Extension Service.  | 
        
            | Conflicts may arise between desired 
            interests, use of time and choice of friends. For example, if a 
            woman retires and assumes that her retired husband has the same 
            enthusiasm for travel as she does, it could create tension if he 
            prefers to stay at home. Think of managing versus resolving 
            the conflict, Danes advises. The following five-step process can 
            help:  1. State the problem to be solved in 
            one sentence. But take time to think about it, since what people 
            argue about is often not the real problem.  2. Write the problem with an "I" 
            statement rather than a "you" statement. That means you state the 
            problem in terms of how you feel, not in terms of what the other 
            person has done.  3. Identify your feelings about the 
            problem. Feelings can include being angry, frustrated, excited, 
            anxious, confused, resentful, hopeful and hurt. Rate the feelings 
            from zero, indicating "not at all," to five, meaning "very." 
             [to top of second 
            column in this article] 
             | 
            
             4. Then get together with your 
            partner. If you don't view the problem in the same manner, start 
            discussing the place where there is agreement about retirement. The 
            tendency is to concentrate only on disagreements, forgetting there 
            are many points you agree on. Concentrate on the hopes and positive 
            ideas, what's most important, who should do what, possible options, 
            and who is helping in positive ways. Then try to sift through points of 
            disagreement. Points to discuss include these: what you need to 
            reduce emotional intensity, what you want the other person to 
            understand about your position, which parts of the problem are your 
            responsibility, which parts you have control over, and who is 
            interfering with whom.  5. List alternative solutions to be 
            investigated.  
            [University of 
            Minnesota Extension Service] 
             |